[time-nuts] WWVB funding cut

John C. Westmoreland, P.E. john at westmorelandengineering.com
Mon Aug 20 22:38:01 EDT 2018


To All,

OK - I'll throw this out there -

What if we do something with AREDN and establish our own service?  We won't
need 'cloud burners' to do an approach that way; and we will be able to
solve two problems at once.

For those that may not be aware, AREDN info can be found here:

https://www.arednmesh.org/

The more nodes we have; the better.  We could run our own time service this
way for not a lot of wattage per person; even run off of solar.  I have a
5V to 24V/48V design that can run one of these
radios for at least a day off of a USB storage battery that is solar
charged; so past the initial investment it would run provided the battery
was charged.

Something to think about.

73's,
John
AJ6BC


On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:39 PM, jimlux <jimlux at earthlink.net> wrote:

> On 8/20/18 4:17 PM, ew via time-nuts wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> They're cutting a lot more than WWV/WWVH/WWVB - they're cutting 300+ folks
> in the labs doing all sorts of things.
>
> Download the doc that Rick posted the link to, go to page NIST-24 and
> start reading..
>
> I don't know enough about how the labs are organized to know if any time
> standards measurement and development (e.g. the next generation atomic
> clocks) is on the chopping block.
>
> They're meeting and exceeding all their performance targets (end of the
> doc) - about twice as many CRADAs as the target, Journal impact factor is
> >1.7
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/
> listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>


More information about the time-nuts mailing list