[time-nuts] new WWVB BPSK dev board
David G. McGaw
David.G.McGaw at dartmouth.edu
Tue Dec 4 20:08:29 UTC 2018
That is the specified jitter. They have also said in communications that it has about 50mS resolution. That is as close as they are willing to say a system can be synchronized with it. Perhaps someone will discover a clever way to enhance that.
BTW, I have been told it has also been successfully tested for lock in Brazil. Is there anyone in Australia want to give it a try? Perth is almost directly opposite Fort Collins. :-)
David N1HAC
On 12/4/18 2:00 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
As was said, IRQ delay is +/-100 mS from the second edge, hardly what a
Time-Nut is looking for.
There is no problem with a delay as long as it is constant. If I know what it
is, then I can correct for it.
The problem is the noise/jitter on the delay. I'm sure somebody will have
data soon.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list