[time-nuts] LT1016 as a pulse shaper...

[Bruce Griffiths]

Somewhat worse than an LTC6957 particularly at low offset frequencies.

Either that or the manufacturers PN noise measurement method doesn't work well at low offsets.

Bruce

> 
>     On 04 March 2018 at 22:34 Leo Bodnar <leo at leobodnar.com> wrote:
> 
>     Ulf,
> 
>     What level of jitter would you consider acceptable?
> 
>     Try PL133-37, I am using it for sinewave shaping on some of designs - including my 30ps pulser.
> 
>     Leo
> 
>     On 3 Mar 2018, at 21:56, time-nuts-request at febo.com wrote:
> 
>         > > 
> >         From: Ulf Kylenfall <ulf_r_k at yahoo.com>
> > 
> >         Gentlemen,
> >         I have so far been using LT1016 as a pulse shaper and also whenever I needed toconvert a sine wave into TTL Logic levels. Some hysteresis and all the decouplingand layout precautions as recommended by LT.
> >         Are there any similar or better alternatives out there that could be usedthat would provide lower jitter and that are less expenceive?
> >         Ulf Kylenfall
> >         SM6GXV
> > 
> >     > 
>     _______________________________________________
>     time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>     To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>     and follow the instructions there.
>