[time-nuts] nuts about position

Bob kb8tq kb8tq at n1k.org
Tue May 1 09:12:05 EDT 2018


Hi

The “drops stuff” problem is exactly what I saw trying to run at lower baud rates. 
The port is *not* full of data, there’s plenty of time to get it all out at a lower baud
rate. For some reason (buffers maybe) these modules start dropping data *way*
earlier than you would think they should. 

Bob

> On Apr 30, 2018, at 10:48 PM, Mark Sims <holrum at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I once spent way too much time trying to get Heather to spit out a RINEX file from a Thunderbolt.   I could never get any of the post-processors to accept it.   The Thunderbolt's raw data needs to somehow be tweaked to be compatible and I didn't really know what I was doing.
> 
> A LEA-6T seems to be able to cope with the data stream at it's default 9600 baud.  I just tried a NEO-8N and it drops packets, etc.   Even weirder, it does not output any of the requested packets that might be flooding the port, but still drops packets.  
> 
> 
> -----------------------
> 
>> You mean that LH does not translate the data to the correct format *and* submit it for post processing ????? 
> 
> There *is* a lot of data when you turn all this stuff on. If you can get above 115K baud, it’s well worth it. 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.




More information about the time-nuts mailing list