[time-nuts] Programmable clock for BFO use....noise
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Sat Sep 15 22:57:31 EDT 2018
Hi
Most of the traditional rules about phase noise apply out to 10 or 20% of the “carrier”
frequency. If the carrier is 1Hz, then you are talking about the traditional definitions holding
out to 0.1 or 0.2 Hz relative to carrier. That’s *deep* in the 1/F noise part of the divider’s
“noise curve”.
Since the ADEV of the 1 PPS is typically no worse than the ADEV of the 10 MHz, it would be
hard to come up with a model where the 1 PPS has picked up a lot of extra noise.
Bob
> On Sep 15, 2018, at 9:05 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That is fascinating. So, the 1PPS line on a GPSDO (a divide by 10Meg in
> many cases) is 70 dB worse than the traditional 20log(N) PN scaling?
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 11:40 AM Richard (Rick) Karlquist <
> richard at karlquist.com> wrote:
>
>> Another great posting from Attila that keeps the S/N ratio
>> on this list high.
>>
>> On 9/15/2018 3:26 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>>
>>> possible logic family for the task. Otherwise the harmonics of the
>>> switching of the FF will down-mix high frequency white noise down
>>> to the signal band (this is the reason for the 10*log(N) noise scaling
>>> of digital divider that Egan[1] and Calosso/Rubiola[2] and a few others
>>> mentioned).
>>
>> Wow, I never knew this in 45 years of designing synthesizers!
>> I do remember that some of the frequency counter engineers at HP
>> talked about noise aliasing. I think this is another way of
>> describing the same problem.
>>
>> About 10 years ago, the frequency synthesizer chip vendors started
>> talking about a Figure of Merit (FOM) that predicted phase noise floor,
>> and it also included the 10 LOG N noise scaling. An application
>> engineer at ADI told me this was a characteristic of the sampling phase
>> detector that all these chips used. But I always wondered if the
>> frequency divider could come into play. The way FOM is defined,
>> it doesn't distinguish between phase detector and divider noise.
>>
>> At Agilent, we used to make a lot of lab demos using a Centellax
>> (now Microsemi AKA Microchip) frequency divider that could divide by any
>> number between 8 and 511 up to 10 GHz. It was absolutely fabulous for
>> dividing 10 GHz down to 2.5 GHz. But 20 LOG N quit working if I tried
>> to divide down to 50 MHz. Now you have explained it.
>>>
>>> If you divide by something that is not a power of 2, then it is important
>>> that each stage produces an output waveform with a 50% duty cycle.
>> Otherwise
>>> flicker noise which has been up-mixed by a previous stage, will be
>> down-mixed
>>> into the signal band, increasing the close-in phase-noise.
>>
>> Wow, another thing I never knew. The conventional wisdom was to
>> divide by any number (even or odd) and then follow that divider
>> with a divide by 2 flip flop to get 50%. Now, that is in question.
>> The now correct answer is to us a variable modulus prescaler to
>> divide by P and P+1, controlled by a toggle flip flop to make
>> half the divisions at P and half at P+1.
>>
>> Does anyone else have experience with these issues?
>>
>> Rick N6RK
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list