[time-nuts] HP OCXO's 10544A and 10811A

[Richard (Rick) Karlquist]

Oops, my bad.  I think it was a BT cut.  But the BT cut
isn't any better on warmup than an AT cut, right?
I don't know much about the 10544.  It was already obsolete
by the time I started at HP 40 years ago.

Rick N6RK

On 8/5/2019 10:20 AM, Scott Newell wrote:
> At 10:25 AM 8/5/2019, timeok at timeok.it wrote:
> 
> 
>>    The 10811 is a SC cut crystal oscillator and the 10544 is an AT cut.
> 
> I thought the 10544 used a BT rock. Seems like I measured the warmup 
> curve of my 5345A to verify this, but maybe I'm confusing something else.
>