[time-nuts] Cesium Mechanical Chronometer
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Sat Feb 1 20:06:02 UTC 2020
Hi
If the idea is to generate a rate card and keep it up to date ….. I think that
can be done with just the GPS. The CSAC really does not add a lot that
I can see to that case.
Of course I may have (yet again) missed something ….
======
The very standard / “old school” approach for this is a microphone on the case
of the M21. These days feed the mic preamp output into a cheap micro along
with the GPS info and away you go. Spit the results out to a little OLED display
maybe …..
Bob
> On Feb 1, 2020, at 1:39 PM, Tom Bales <tob.starhouse at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Many thanks for everyone's response on my cesium-synchronized mechanical
>> chronometer project. I'll keep the group informed of progress. Some
>> responses to your questions and suggestions:
>
>
> - My current plan is to use a chronometer that has been adjusted for
> rate and is close to dead-on. Of course, they're never dead-on, and that's
> why keeping track of the rate is important. I haven't dismissed the idea
> of actually disciplining the chrono from the CSAC, but since this chrono's
> rate adjustment involves screws on the balance wheel (it has a free-sprung
> helical balance spring without any means of adjustment), that would be a
> great challenge. Perhaps the best would be for the CSAC system to maintain
> a "rate card" of the chronometer, so that when all the electronics fail,
> and the user is left with only the chrono, at least they would have a
> really good knowledge of its rate and variation. Doing so would require a
> feedback signal from the chrono, which could be acoustic or photoelectric.
> The electronic rate card could be updated now and then by turning off the
> sync impulse to the chrono and listening for the ticks to move relative to
> the 1pps.
> - The chrono would need a bigger box in order to incorporate the
> CSAC/GPS system, microcontroller, and--the biggest part--backup batteries.
> That's part of the fun, and I'm thinking to mount the gimballed chrono in a
> purpose-built enclosure that will hold everything. Connections to the
> chrono will have to be very flexible FFC or silicone wire.
> - I thiink auto-winding is a definite requirement. The engineering
> challenge is to couple a small gearmotor to the winding system without
> disabling the manual-winding system that uses a ratcheted key. Winding
> noise should be short in duration, so it probably won't affect the time
> sync. People have wound chronos by turning them upside down in the gimbals
> and poking a key through a hole for a long time without any big issues.
> - Coupling to the chrono balance and escapement might be difficult, or
> it might be easy. If it takes hours or days to synchronize, that's OK, I
> think. My guess is that anything that generates a slight impulse in the
> direction of the escapement detent or a torque pulse to couple to the
> balance will work well enough--a tiny little linear or rotary
> electromagnetic actuator should work. We'll see.
> - The Hamilton M21 chrono beats at 2Hz, so driving it with a 1pps signal
> will probably work fine.
> - The idea that TVB suggests of disciplining the CSAC to match the
> chrono is fascinating, indeed. Hadn't thought of that one. It would be
> the easiest way to keep the chrono and CSAC in sync, and it would still use
> the traditional rate-card method of keeping track of the actual time.
> Hmmmm.
> - Yes, the CSAC modules are expensive! Over $5k currently. It seems
> like during the evaluation period the company sold them "at a discount" in
> order to build applications and sales (or so the court documents say). Let
> me know if anyone sees a gyneesium one on *bay. I thought long and hard
> before buying it, but idle hands are the devil's cash register. (Oh,
> oh!--now I have an excuse to buy an HP 53230!) In my initial measurements
> of rate (after GPS disciplining for 24 hours) the CSAC freewheels within
> 1.7ms/yr. Probably good enough. Needs longer testing.
> - The M21 has a single balance wheel consisting of an Invar spoke and a
> stainless steel ring (it was Hamilton's magical way of doing temperature
> compensation to match the balance spring. The Russian knock-offs have a
> standard bi-metal split balance wheel. The Hamiltons beat just about
> anything in performance. Besides, "Murica!".
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list