[time-nuts] Phase measurement of my GPSDO
Matthias Welwarsky
time-nuts at welwarsky.de
Wed Aug 12 14:45:49 UTC 2020
On Mittwoch, 12. August 2020 13:23:57 CEST Tobias Pluess wrote:
> On the picture `gpsdo_180_210.png` one can see the last 30 hours of my
> measured data. During this time, the DAC value need to change only by 9
> counts. I think the DAC value has a slight trend to go lower and lower,
> this is perhaps because my OCXO was new and is still a bit aging. Phase
> error stays within +/-15ns during the whole time!
TimeLab can tell you the linear drift from the imported data.
> As I still don't have a proper DMTD system or anything similar which allows
> me to `quickly` estimate the stability of my device, I made some
> experiments and imported my logged data int Timelab. This can be seen in
> the picture `timelab_estimated_from_dac.png`. The blue curve results when I
> analyse the phase error. As expected, since this is essentially the
> performance of the 1PPS signal, the curve goes lower and lower. (I imported
> this data as "phase difference" and scaled it with 1e-9).
> The pink curve results when I let Timelab analyse the DAC values. This idea
> is actually from a colleague on this list. It assumes that the OCXO is
> perfectly stable and the only instability comes from the DAC being
> disturbed by the 1PPS noise. To analyse this, I imported the data as
> "Frequency Difference" and scaled it appropriately (scaling factor is
> 7.6e-12 as I have approx. 5 to 6Hz tuning range of the OCXO per 16 Bits). I
> am not sure how accurate this estimation will be, but if it is only close
> to the reality then it appears that my GPSDO has a stability in the range
> 1e-12. According to John's comparisons here:
>
> http://www.ke5fx.com/gpscomp.htm
>
> this would mean it is slightly better than a BG7TBL and quite a bit worse
> than a Tbolt with 10811A oscillator.
The DAC analysis tells you mainly how much "instability" the regulation causes
for a given tau. The GPSDO output can not be better than this value.
Typically, it's worse than the DAC ADEV. I've been doing some simulations with
TvBs GPSDO simulator a while ago (might have posted some graphs here, cannot
quite remember), the DAC ADEV (or MDEV) starts to influence the OCXO
performance when they become close.
> Comments welcome. I hope I get my two Rb standards soon and can then do
> some DMTD tests.
Looking forward to seeing some actual measurements!
>
>
> Tobias
> HB9FSX
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow
> the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list