[time-nuts] Examples of traditional phase noise analyzers

[Bob kb8tq]

Hi

This is probably a more “citation worthy” version of the Fluke App note
everybody used:

A Test Set for the Accurate Measurement of Phase Noise on High-Quality Signal Sources

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4313904


Bob

> On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:02 AM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> wrote:
> 
> Good afternoon,
> 
> In the process of writing my thesis I stumbled over the problem
> that the definition of what phase noise is in IEEE 1139 is a bit
> confusing, to put it mildly. After a short discussion with
> Magnus, it seems clear to me that I need to have a better
> understanding of how phase noise measurement was done in the
> past to properly understand what the standard means to say.
> 
> I think, I have a decent grasp on how modern phase noise analyzer
> work, safe for a few details here and there, where they seem to
> try to mimic what the old analog analyzers did.
> 
> Before I go on a wild goose chace, I thought I ask here for
> advice: Could you point me at as detailed as possible descriptions
> on how phase noise analyzers used to work in the purely analog
> times? Preferably also as many different approaches as possible.
> And, if you are aware of anything that I should have a look at
> that might not be obvious to a youngster like me, I would very
> much appreciate if you would let me know.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> 			Attila Kinali
> 
> -- 
> The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
> There are things we don't understand and things we always 
> wonder about. And that's why we do research.
> 		-- Kobayashi Makoto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.