[time-nuts] WWVB Dephaser Question

[paul swed]

Hello to the group.
Ray as Bob mentions you are taking a 10s of uv signal to a logic level of
maybe 4V.
If the loop is any place close to the divided down signal, it will
oscillate. It would take incredible shielding to protect the receiver.
Thats why you often see a solution that doubles to 120 KHz and modifies the
detectors to work at that frequency. That means hacking the radio
internally. Not fun. The other really annoy effect is that the doubling
slips phace due to noise and propagation. So if charting suddenly you get a
180 degree flip. Thats messy.
The doubling solution can work. Search for carter and there are several
others.
But having tested and used all of the alternates and lots more on the east
coast decided they were too much trouble. You should see the box of boards
I have chuckle.
For me I am very happy with the d-psk-r. Though in being above board I
designed version 1 and Rodger and I did version 2. Its solid and no mods to
any receiver. Everything has always been released to the time-nuts group.
As they say have fun.
Regards
Paul.
WB8TSL

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:39 PM <rcbuck at atcelectronics.com> wrote:

> Bob,
>
> I am using a ferrite rod antenna for the receiver. No outside antenna.
>
> Ray
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Dephaser Question
> From: Bob kb8tq <kb8tq at n1k.org>
> Date: Thu, October 08, 2020 12:40 pm
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> <time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
>
> Hi
>
> A lot depends on your antenna setup. You can also swamp out the incoming
> WWVB signal…….
>
> Bob
>
> > On Oct 8, 2020, at 2:07 PM, <rcbuck at atcelectronics.com> <
> rcbuck at atcelectronics.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have read several different articles where the WWVB phase shift is
> > eliminated by doubling the signal to 120 kHz. Several members of the
> > list have built these units.
> >
> > Assume I build a circuit to double the incoming signal and use a schmitt
> > trigger to get a 120 kHz square wave. If I then divide that signal back
> > down to 60 kHz will that signal be strong enough to swamp out the WWVB
> > signal? I'm guessing it will be since it is at the 5 volt level and
> > somewhere in the +25 dBm or greater range.
> >
> > Ray,
> > AB7HE
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
>