[time-nuts] Re: Poor's man NTP

[David Taylor]

On 18/12/2021 21:13, giuseppe at marullo.it wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>> If you have a requirement for always being in the microseconds rather than milliseconds, PTP is a better approach.
> I just need it for logs and computer time sync, PTP seems overkill for my requirements.
> It is a small lab, then maybe I could offer NTP (SecureNTP) service for the rest of the company, if I will add other NTP/SecureNTP servers depending on the load.
> 
> Giuseppe Marullo
> IW2JWW - JN45RQ

Giuseppe,

If you are considering something for "the rest of the company" you could save 
yourself a lot of bother by getting something like the LeoNTP box:

   http://www.leobodnar.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=272

   https://store.uputronics.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=70

It just sits there and works, and can serve many thousands of NTP clients. 
Good luck in finding one, though, due to the current component shortage.

73,
David GM8ARV
-- 
SatSignal Software - Quality software for you
Web: https://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor at blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv