[time-nuts] Re: Please help. Motorola Oncore

Mon Sep 19 22:27:58 UTC 2022

Hi

It would not surprise me at all to find that a modern version of the
almanac is different than the 1998 version. A lot has changed since
then. 

Given that you can find these for < $10 on eBay. I would not invest
a lot in them at this point â€¦. Once you get them running, you will 
have roll over issues. 

Bob

> On Sep 19, 2022, at 4:36 PM, Marcelo Dantas <marcelo.f.dantas at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
> The modules are old. 1998/2000.
> 
> I have left the UT+ running for about 36 Hrs. I have noticed that the battery on the UT+ is dead, so I am ordering a replacement.
> However, while running powered for 36 hours I expected it would see "something". I wish there was a way to verify some of its internal information, to see if it was actually collecting something.
> 
> The WinOncore software allows you to upload an almanac, and it talks about a .alm file extension, and on the .gov site I only found a latest_yuma.alm file, which I uploaded, but it would still show "bad almanac".
> I have also tried to upload a .al3 (SEM) file, with the same result.
> Both files seem to upload, so I am not sure which one should be the correct one, or if both are.   I am assuming the yuma because it has the .alm extension. (still a noob in this matter)
> 
> On a new development, the GT+ started showing satellites, it shows 10 satellites visible, zero tracked.
> The UT+ regardless of the almanacs uploaded, still shows zero visible, zero tracked.
> 
> I am still trying to find a reference to the correct (expected) almanac file format and to the eventual calibration procedure referred previously.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcelo.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 5:10 PM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq at n1k.org <mailto:kb8tq at n1k.org>> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> If itâ€™s showing â€œbad almanacâ€ then that is part of the issue. 
> It may not be *all* of the issue â€¦.
> 
> How old are these modules? They went through several 
> revisions and each one was a big leap over the previous 
> version. If they date back far enough, it could take a very
> long time to come up with an almanac. 
> 
> Bob
> 
>> On Sep 19, 2022, at 3:41 PM, Marcelo Dantas <marcelo.f.dantas at gmail.com <mailto:marcelo.f.dantas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> @Bjorn: It is the same antenna which worked back then, it was sitting there in the same drawer. So, unless it degrades somehow over time, it should continue to work I guess.
>> I have no idea though how to measure/verify if there's saturation going on.
>> When I plugged this antenna to a U-Blox it immediately kicked in with a bunch of satellites in view, but the U-Blox might also have a different input impedance.
>> 
>> @Bob "off for a while" means since mid 2018. So I immediately thought of an almanac, however I could not yet figure out the .alm file it would require.
>> I have downloaded almanac files from the web, not oncore specific, but when importing them via WinOncore I do not get any success/failure messages, and the device continues to show "bad almanac"  on its status.
>> I have a feeling that the issue is towards bad/outdated internal information. Or maybe the calibration John spoke about, if I can figure it out, could help.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Marcelo.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob kb8tq via time-nuts <time-nuts at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com>> wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> The other gotcha depends a lot on just how long â€œoff for a whileâ€ is. 
>> If any of these devices are off power for decades, the internal data 
>> for the almanac ( = which sats are where ) will be way off. 
>> 
>> The process of random search is a lot faster with the newer modules. 
>> They have way more processing horsepower. Just how many hours
>> (or days) it takes this or that example of an early module to come 
>> back to life â€¦. who knows â€¦.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> > On Sep 19, 2022, at 2:14 PM, John Ackermann N8UR via time-nuts <time-nuts at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Some of the early Motorola receivers had an issue with long-term XO drift.  That can result in failure to lock if the unit has been powered off for a long time.  There is a procedure to recalibrate it (no test equipment required).  I think it was written up in a Motorola app note that's available on line, but I can't put my finger on it right now.
>> > 
>> > John
>> > -----
>> > 
>> > On 9/19/22 07:53, Gregory Beat via time-nuts wrote:
>> >> IF you start with Fixed Position mode, THEN this speeds up process.
>> >> I would also suggest a CLEAR View of Sky for the Antenna.
>> >> Motorola Oncore UT Plus Engineering Notes (circa 2000)
>> >> https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ut-engg-notes.pdf <https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ut-engg-notes.pdf>
>> >> Motorola Oncore GT Plus Engineering Notes (circa 2000)
>> >> https://www.tapr.org/pdf/GT_Eng_Notes.pdf <https://www.tapr.org/pdf/GT_Eng_Notes.pdf>
>> >> UT Plus model numbers:
>> >> R5122U111x - right angle OSX
>> >> R5222U111x - right angle OSX, on-board Lithium battery
>> >> R5122U115x - straight OSX
>> >> GT Plus model numbers:
>> >> R3111G111x - standard version
>> >> R3211G111x - on-board Lithium battery
>> >> R3111G114x - SMB antenna connector
>> >> greg, w9gb
>> >> ==
>> >> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:42:18 -0400
>> >> From: Marcelo Dantas <marcelo.f.dantas at gmail.com <mailto:marcelo.f.dantas at gmail.com>>
>> >> Subject: [time-nuts] Thanks for adding me, and please help. Motorola Oncore
>> >> To: time-nuts at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
>> >> Hi there Everyone,
>> >> Thanks for accepting me to this list.
>> >> I am in (dire) need of help here and maybe one of you is a Motorola Oncore
>> >> user and could assist.
>> >> I have a couple Motorola Oncore modules, which I use mounted to a
>> >> "baseboard" for timing purposes.
>> >> One is a R5222U1115 and the other a R3111G1112.
>> >> They have been sitting in a drawer for some time. Being "some time" since
>> >> the pre-pandemic era.
>> >> Now I am trying to use them again but for whatever reason they won't lock
>> >> to any satellites.
>> >> The modules are starting up, sending 1pps and seem to be accepting commands
>> >> correctly.
>> >> I have also tested the baseboard (power, serial, etc) and the antenna.
>> >> The antenna works well on a third (non-motorola) module.
>> >> I have tried everything, left the modules there running for 24 hours.
>> >> No joy. None of them will lock to any satellites.
>> >> I have tried defaulting them using WinOncore, no change.
>> >> I have also tried to find an almanac file to upload, hoping it would help,
>> >> but couldn't find one with the required .alm file extension.
>> >> At this point I do not know what to do anymore. I have a system (module,
>> >> board, antenna, power, etc.) that should just work, and yet it refuses to.
>> >> Maybe there's some special factory reset? Maybe there's some command I do
>> >> not know about? Maybe other software than WinOncore with some extra
>> >> debug options?
>> >> Any guidance here would be deeply appreciated.
>> >> Thanks a lot in advance,
>> >> Marcelo.
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com <mailto:time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com>