[time-nuts] Re: Rb Standards C-fields
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Tue Aug 22 13:03:05 UTC 2023
Hi
What is the goal?
Temperature stability will always be a limiting factor in any of this.
The control signal is only supplying part of the C field current. The ârest of itâ is coming from devices internal to the package.
Bob
> On Aug 22, 2023, at 1:50 AM, Bob Stewart via time-nuts <time-nuts at lists.febo.com> wrote:
>
> Is there someplace I could get some practical information about C-fields in Rb standards? I'm not looking for the physics of how they work. What I need is on the practical side. This relates to the AT&T RFG-RB unit I bought. Looking at the components, I don't see any obvious voltage references. It has a couple of power supply chips, but nothing better than an LM-340T-5 or whatever it was. And the C-field adjustment is a 10-turn 5K pot.
> My bottom line question is this: Would it would make any real difference to the stability of the 10MHz output if I were to add an external voltage reference chip, such as an ADR4550A (or B or C) and a 25-turn pot, or even a DAC1220-E and a dsPIC33 to run it? I'm assuming the center C-field voltage is 2.5V. Given all the electronics in the thing, I'm tempted to just pull both boards out and make a new board to support the Rb oscillator with just the features I need. But if the thing is already near the limits of the Rb oscillator there's no point. It contains an Efratom 102100-003, for which I can't find any information.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list