[time-nuts] Re: pps pulse timestamp device
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Sun Feb 11 17:35:33 UTC 2024
Hi
I 100% agree that the TICC is a great choice. One very minor point:
Like anything else, you will need an accurate / stable âstandardâ to feed it with. This is also true of any reasonable alternative I can think of. There are a range GPSDO and telecom Rb options to sort through to meet that need. Yes, there are a *lot* of possible choices, those are the ones that most folks turn to.
Bob
> On Feb 11, 2024, at 11:52â¯AM, John Miller via time-nuts <time-nuts at lists.febo.com> wrote:
>
> Juan,
> Check out the TAPR TICC: https://tapr.org/product/tapr-ticc/
>
> John K1QLN
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [time-nuts] pps pulse timestamp device
> Date: 2024-02-11 7:37 am
> From: juan--- via time-nuts <time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
> To: time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a cheap device (e.g. Teansy, micropython board, etc) that would help me measure with ns resolution some pulses at one event per second rate (gps pps).
>
> It would need quite a stable clock such that any jitter would be attributable to the pulse signal.
>
> Any ideas what is the best way around this nowadays?
>
> Thanks,
> Juan.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list