[time-nuts] Re: Sulzer 5B Quartz Frequency Standard Questions

[paul swed]

I don't know that there was ever any restriction on the use of the sulzers.
But I think they were the late 1950s and 60s and maybe they did not have
the glass variable caps back then. Sort of doubt that. By the way you are
correct on the capacitors design.
It does seem odd. But you have it working, be happy.
Paul
WB8TSL


On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:31 PM Stan via time-nuts <
time-nuts at lists.febo.com> wrote:

> Update: I reseated connectors and got the 1 MHz and 100 kHz divider chains
> working.
>
> I found that the stiffness in the fine tuning mechanism was caused by a
> binding turns counting dial. The rest of the mechanism moved freely and to
> both extremes of rotation when the dial was removed. I disassembled,
> cleaned, and lubed the dial, and then reinstalled it. Now everything works
> as it should. I'm letting the standard stabilize before I attempt any
> adjustments.
>
> One comment about the fine frequency adjustment. One side of the trimmer
> capacitor is the copper rod, and the other side is a metal cylinder that
> has insulation (dielectric?) on the inner surface and is held stationary
> while the rod advances into or retracts out of it, thus changing the value
> of the trimming capacitance.
>
> What stood out to me when I examined this tuning capacitor mechanism is
> that the cylinder is attached to a short length of stiff wire that is then
> soldered to a nearby contact on the PC board. The only thing holding this
> cylinder in position is the stiffness of the wire. Since we're talking
> about being able to adjust the frequency in 5x10E-11 increments, with a
> total range of 1x10E-7 given by a travel of the rod of less than 1/2", I
> would think that any impact, vibration or other mechanical stress might
> cause the cylinder to shift, thereby changing the trimmer capacitor value.
> Maybe this standard is only supposed to be used in a vibration-free and
> stress-free environment, but it still seems like a poor design in an
> otherwise well-engineered frequency standard.
>
> Thanks again to everyone for their help with this.
>
> Stan
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
>