[volt-nuts] HP 3457A calibration?

Joseph Gray jgray at zianet.com
Mon Aug 19 23:15:55 EDT 2013


Someone pointed out in the comments that his DMM was probably calibrated
once or twice at the most.

>From looking at what is on this guys shelf, he has way more money than I do
to spend on test equipment. I'm jealous :-)

Speaking of too much test equipment, that guy Dave who does the EEVBlog
videos also has a lab to drool over. I don't know what he does for a
living, but he seems to be more knowledgeable than the guy from South
Africa (who is also long winded and boring).

As for the "cheaper" solution, I just bought a 3457A. I expect to see it
this week. After checking it out for a bit, I'll be sending it to Agilent.
Although it may seem ridiculous to spend $200 getting it calibrated, I
figure that I'd be better off having Agilent do it this time, so I know
where I stand.

I'll have to read the cal counter before and after sending it to Agilent.
I'll let you know the results.

If the battery looks original, I'll have to change that out before sending
it for calibration. I know that I have to keep the SRAM powered, so I don't
loose the data already there.

Joe Gray
W5JG



On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:59 PM, J. L. Trantham <jltran at att.net> wrote:

> Interesting video.
>
> His 'cal certificate' shows no data other than 'in tolerance' and the
> 'standards' used to established that.
>
> He also makes a point of the 'calibration counter'.
>
> On the 3458A that I was able to 'kill' the 'cal RAM', the 'cal counter' was
> at '1' when I received it.  When I finished doing my 'home cal' on a
> 'blank'
> 'cal RAM', the 'cal counter' was about 20 or so.  It appears that every
> measurement that is calibrated increments the 'cal counter'.
>
> I don't recall how many ranges the 3457A has but add them all up and that
> is
> what I would expect the 'cal counter' to increment by once you finish a
> 'home cal'.
>
> Since Agilent does all this via HPIB (at least that's what I think), it
> increments the 'cal counter' only by '1' step.
>
> I would opt for a 'cheaper' 'seems to be working' 3457A then send it to
> Agilent for their calibration rather than spend extra for someone else's
> calibration.
>
> Joe
> WB4BPP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: volt-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:volt-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Gray
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:20 PM
> To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement
> Subject: [volt-nuts] HP 3457A calibration?
>
> Recently, we were discussing where to get a DMM calibrated. Someone
> mentioned an ebay seller in Albuquerque who had their meters calibrated
> across town by a company with a similar name.
>
> I am currently watching a YouTube video about the HP 3457A. At around 7
> minutes, take a look at the calibration certificate when he holds it up.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfxpJCdgVwc
>
> Joe Gray
> W5JG
> _______________________________________________
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>


More information about the volt-nuts mailing list