[time-nuts] MTBF (was Rubidium standard)
SAIDJACK at aol.com
SAIDJACK at aol.com
Wed Nov 18 23:21:00 UTC 2009
Hi Poul-Henning,
from what I read, they a) had no tools to replace the units or even open
the computer, b) the software was different between the units (LEM had 1/2
the ROM to save weight), and c) the spacecraft attitude thrusters and the
main engines were fully computer controlled (their control Joysticks were
true fly-by-wire, they went through the computer, and thruster control was
done by software). So no computer meant no attitude thrusters or acceleration.
So having to rely on two of these computers during the separated period
would actually double their chances of some form of mission failure. Of course
the LEM could not be used for re-entry in to the atmosphere either.
If the Command Module computer failed (and it was apparently not built with
redundant circuitry) then: - game over.
But on the other hand they considered the human element failure, they had
fully automatic return and landing capability in case the humans expired...
bye,
Said
In a message dated 11/18/2009 15:07:02 Pacific Standard Time,
phk at phk.freebsd.dk writes:
In message <cb8.5c4f5c26.3835d6b2 at aol.com>, SAIDJACK at aol.com writes:
>A single transistor, ROM bit, solder-joint, or resistor failure could
have
>killed them.
Actually there were a perfectly good spare in the lunar lander module
and most single points of failure would not kill them, but merely
cause the mission to abort and head home.
They also hard backup navigational aids.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list