[time-nuts] Absolute time accuracy pre-Cesium?

[Bob Albert]

 I have been pondering something somewhat related to all of this.
We know that the smallest unit of a substance is a molecule.  The smallest unit of charge is maybe an electron.  So what could one imagine the smallest unit of time to be?  Is time digital in the nanoscale, or is it always an analog measurement?  Or, more fundamentally, is is just a concept rather than a reality?
Bob
    On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 7:00:45 AM PDT, Kevin Birth <Kevin.Birth at qc.cuny.edu> wrote:  
 
 It all depends on how far back you want to go.  With mechanical
timepieces, even before the pendulum there was Jost Burgi¹s astronomical
clock which achieved a precision of a second, and is reported to have been
accurate to that level based on astronomical measurements.  Tycho Brahe
tried to achieve accuracy through using multiple clocks.  This technique
actually seems to have been developed before Brahe with potentates like
Charles V having large numbers of clocks that he tried to synchronize.
There is at least one case of a Holy Roman Emperor with a bundle of clocks
getting angry at a clockmaker for having sold him a poor performing
clock‹that was Rudolf II.

Before that you have some of the great Islamic observatories that measured
time with very large instruments.  Here is a link, even without a
knowledge of Arabic, one can get a sense from the pictures how these
Muslim astronomers used scale to achieve great accuracy and precision.
What limited them were their materials‹at a certain scale their
instruments started to warp under their own weight.  Many of the
principles in these instruments were based on Ptolemy¹s ALMAGEST, which
takes things back to the 3rd century AD or so.

Here¹s the link: 
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8414999t.r=taqi%20al-din%20instrumen
ts?rk=21459;2

Before that the most detailed account of time measurement equipment is in
Vitruvius¹ work on architecture, but Vitruvius¹ descriptions are often
garbled, so there is no good way to judge their accuracy in relationship
to their claims of precision.

Less well documented are Persian and South Asian methods in which the
smallest unit translates to something like the duration of a blink of an
eye.  I do not know enough about those traditions to know what
observational methods or instruments they used to measure such a unit
(other than blinking a lot).

Best,

Kevin


-- 
Kevin K. Birth, Professor
Department of Anthropology
Queens College, City University of New York
65-30 Kissena Boulevard
Flushing, NY 11367
telephone: 718/997-5518

"Tempus est mundi instabilis motus, rerumque labentium cursus." --Hrabanus
Maurus

"We may live longer but we may be subject to peculiar contagion and
spiritual torpor or illiteracies of the imagination" --Wilson Harris




On 3/26/19, 7:30 AM, "time-nuts on behalf of John Ackermann.  N8UR"
<time-nuts-bounces at lists.febo.com on behalf of jra at febo.com> wrote:

>EXTERNAL EMAIL: please report suspicious content to the ITS Help Desk.
>
>
>All -- thanks much for all the great references!  I am giving the preso
>this afternoon (to a bunch of university space science students) so this
>will be a big help.  And it looks like there's a lot of great reading for
>when I have time to breathe.
>
>Thanks again.
>John
>
>On Mar 25, 2019, 10:03 PM, at 10:03 PM, Ben Bradley
><ben.pi.bradley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>For independent standards (not quite what you asked) I recall from
>>"The Science of Clocks and Watches" (a book with much technical info
>>if you're interested in these mechanical devices) that the most
>>accurate mechanical/pendulum clock was the Shortt Clock that used a
>>pendulum in a vacuum chamber for its standard. Mechanical clocks were
>>replaced by more stable electronic quartz crystal oscillators, and
>>then finally by atomic clocks.
>>
>>Perhaps closer to your question: I recall in my readings about
>>clockmaker John Harrison (likely either in "The Quest for Longitude"
>>or Dava Sobel's "Longitude") that he would look from the edge of his
>>window at a particular star each night and note (while counting the
>>ticks he heard from his clock) the exact moment it would disappear
>>behind a nearby chimney, and knowing the Earth's rotation takes four
>>minutes and some (I forget) seconds off from a day, he used this to
>>calibrate and test the precision and accuracy of his long clocks. It
>>was suggested he could get within less than second with this method.
>>This was around age 21, so the year would be about 1714. Looking
>>online for PZT (photographic zenith tube), I didn't find much about
>>it, but it was surely first made a couple centuries after this.
>>
>>The Sobel book (all about how Harrison won the Longitude prize) is
>>more a popular book and less technical, but "Quest" has many
>>mostly-technical articles, mostly about Harrison, as well as beautiful
>>photos of his clocks. One or two of the articles is by the man who
>>made (or made the parts for it, the story is complicated) the
>>one-second-in-100-days "Clock B" pendulum clock, built from Harrison's
>>writings and claims of just that accuracy in the book he wrote shortly
>>before his death.
>>
>>On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:00 PM John Ackermann N8UR <jra at febo.com>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone have a pointer to information about the absolute time
>>> accuracy (not stability) that was available via PZT or other
>>techniques
>>> prior to the Cesium definition?  I'm doing a presentation and want to
>>> show the evolution of accuracy.  My Google-fu has failed me in
>>finding
>>> anything pre-Atomic.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to
>>http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>>To unsubscribe, go to
>>http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>>and follow the instructions there.
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
>http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.