[time-nuts] Digital Phase Lock Loops
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Tue Nov 19 12:34:32 UTC 2019
Hi
Unless the 100 MHz “VCO” is an OCXO, it is going to be tough
to keep things locked at a fractional Hz sort of bandwidth. It’s simply a matter
of how much the phase / frequency is likely to change while you are trying
to get it to lock / keep it locked. Things like shock and vibration get into it along
with temperature.
There’s nothing “magic” about digital vs analog. You do the same things
with both. Gain margin / phase margin / damping matter in any control loop.
Both approaches run into side issues with things like divider and phase detector
noise floors.
You may need a wide bandwidth loop to get things lined up and a soft
switchover ( = no spikes ) to a narrower bandwidth. You see that done in GPSDO’s
a lot. Plenty of grubby details to deal with …..
Bob
> On Nov 19, 2019, at 4:48 AM, martyn at ptsyst.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Have anyone had any luck designing a phase lock loop with very small
> bandwidths, e.g. less than 0.2 Hz.
>
>
>
> I need to lock a 100 MHz Ultra low oscillator to a 10 MHz ultra low
> oscillator and I need a loop bandwidth less than 0.2 Hz.
>
>
>
> Quartzlock do a digital PLL board with bandwidths to 1 mHz. However I never
> got it to work.
>
>
>
> The 10 MHz reference has phase noise of -116 dBc/Hz at 1Hz offset. The 100
> MHz VCO make -104 at 1 Hz.
>
>
>
> Obviously I'm trying to preserve the 100 MHz phase noise.
>
>
>
> Any advice would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Martyn
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list