[time-nuts] tracking position & orientation

Magnus Danielson magnus at rubidium.se
Fri Nov 22 09:01:48 UTC 2019


Hi,

You would probably want to have three antennas and receivers, and we
talk about choke-ring antennas and two-frequency receivers. You should
have your receivers hooked up to a common clock, such as a rubidium clock.

The continental drift is measureable by GPS, and is in the range of
mm/year. You would need quite a bit of data and post-process it with
reference to other data to be able to draw good conclusions.

You can however to some degree detect rotation, but you have to realize
that the distance between the antennas becomes the limitation to it's
ability to detect rotation and rotation speed. Realize that sagging of
antenna mounts can introduce false sense of rotation. Rotation will
probably not provide very useful info.

Remember to do a baseline measurement down at Baseline Rd. :)

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2019-11-21 21:13, Eric Scace wrote:
> I need another project like a hole in the head — but curiosity
> continues to nag me.
>
> I moved to Boulder CO a few months ago. The “curiosity” is to
> determine the position of two antennas at either end of my house and
> monitor it over time, with the idea that one could see plate movement
> in 3 dimensions plus rotation around the axes.
>
> What hardware/software would be suitable for a TimeNuts
> (PositionNuts?) project like this?
>
> — Eric K3NA
>
>
>> On 11/21/19 8:00 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Way back in time, the first gear out there to use what we now look at
>> as “normal” antennas was survey gear. For various reasons they
>> decided on a 12V power supply and 40 to 50 db
>> of gain in the preamp mounted in the antenna. They also got into L1 /
>> L2 pretty quickly.
>> A bit later the cell phone (and later broadcast) guys got into this.
>> In a location with a lot of RF (like a cell site) having a lot of
>> gain at the antenna didn’t work all that well. IMD issues got into
>> the act pretty quickly. In addition, front end filtering was required
>> to reduce overload
>> issues. The focus was on L1 only so filtering was relatively easy.
>>
>> There is a whole separate set of antennas that put a big chunk of the
>> RF portion of the radio
>> in the antenna. Those still survive here and there. I have one of
>> them and probably a couple
>> of dozen of the more “normal” antennas.
>> As time marched on, supplying 12V to antennas became a bit less
>> popular. Most of the cell guys went over to a 5V antenna supply. The
>> net result was 12V 50 db survey antennas that did L1/L2 and much
>> smaller 5V 25 db antennas for “timing”. The timing antennas didn’t do
>> L1/L2 so
>> not going to work for survey. The survey antennas had way to much
>> gain and no filtering so not going to work for a cell site.
>> Indeed things did and do get crossed up in various pro and basement
>> systems. With care and
>> the right set of circumstances things may work. In other cases the
>> result can be an ongoing set
>> of systems issues over an entire network of stations.
>> Prices for a good new survey antenna are up in the many thousands of
>> dollars range. They have
>> very stable phase centers and (usually) test results to allow
>> correction of any residual phase issues. This is part of what lets
>> you get into the “couple of mm” range on a survey.
>> For timing, you have to dig a bit and answer a few questions. Is your
>> concern how close you
>> are to BIH? If so you will need to know all the delays in your
>> system. This includes the delays
>> in the antenna filters and the preamp. Is your concern (or measure)
>> the ADEV at 1 second?
>> If so the delays are not a concern. Your antenna choice may be a bit
>> different depending on
>> this focus.
>>
>> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.






More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list