[time-nuts] Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 14

Francis Grosz nolafg47 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 15 17:05:34 UTC 2021


Marek,

      Following Mark's suggestion, if you really want to clean up the 10
MHz
you might want to look at the AXTAL AXPLO10.  Not a cheap solution, but
 it's specifically designed to do what you're looking for.

               Francis Grosz


On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:27 AM <time-nuts-request at lists.febo.com> wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:42:52 -0700
> From: Mark Goldberg <marklgoldberg at gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Best Leo Bodnar configuration for 10MHz
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>         <time-nuts at lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAKn+a3tW2ACSQfyotC5A+mQFHjArhS9ag9K=
> kPpGPSLdtTbmxg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Define better. I am passing the output at a different frequency through a
> Wentzel oscillator to "clean it up". That gets rid of farther out spurs, so
> I chose settings that pushed spurs as far as possible. I'm not sure you can
> determine what is best for your application without measuring the output
> for what is important to you. I could not see a significant difference in
> close in phase noise with different configurations, but my measurement
> capability is somewhat limited.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:17 PM Marek Dorsic <marek.dorsic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Community,
> >
> >    I received my Leo Bodnar Mini GPS Reference Clock.
> > The same 10MHz output frequency can be achieved by varios configuration
> > settings.
> > Are some of these combinations better than others?
> >
> >      .marek
> > _______________________________________________
>
>




More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list