[time-nuts] Re: What GNSS module to buy for a good time reference?

[Erik Kaashoek]

John,
Thanks for the reply. The accurate position info to improve the PPS is 
indeed the goal. This should allow using the ZED-F9T PPS as reference 
for checking the absolute phase accuracy of the PPS from a cheap GPS.
I did not try if google earth or open street map can provide any 
accuracy in location.  The pin in google earth seems to have a 
resolution of about 50 cm and I can position it on top of my GPS antenna 
but I'm not sure how accurate google positions their photos.
Going back in time shows most of the newer high resolution photo's are 
positioned the same within 50cm, others are shifted up to 10 meters.
Erik.

On 2-7-2023 17:41, John Ackermann N8UR via time-nuts wrote:
> Hi Erik --
>
> The ZED-F9T will give you about the best (lowest jitter) PPS accuracy 
> of any of the modestly priced modules, but I don't think 
> post-processing the results will help you with timing.
>
> You can use the u-blox RAWX message to output raw data which can then 
> be converted to RINEX format by one of several means, and then send 
> the RINEX file for processing (or process it yourself with something 
> like RTKLIB).  The results will give you highly accurate position 
> information, usually better with longer observation times.
>
> But the ZED-F9T uses a free-running TCXO for its clock, and can't 
> accept an external reference source.  As a result, the clock data 
> returned from the post processing service is pretty much meaningless 
> because of the TCXO inaccuracy and instability.
>
> By contrast, the clock results from receivers that are locked to a 
> quality external reference can be used to determine both time and 
> frequency offset and stability down to parts in 10e-15 over long 
> intervals.
>
> I am not sure which post-processing site is best for Europe.  I don't 
> think that NRCan has any boundary restrictions (I use them in the 
> U.S.) but I don't know if their algorithms cross continents.
>
> In a roundabout way, you can improve your PPS performance by getting a 
> good post-processed receiver position, and using that as the ZED-F9T's 
> fixed location mode position.  The closer your stated position is to 
> actual, the better the PPS results (though a few centimeters won't 
> make much difference).  But that's the only timing benefit 
> post-processing provides for the ZED-F9T.
>
> John
> ----
>
> On 7/2/23 11:09, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:
>> As I needed the accurate PPS in the coming weeks I decided to go for the
>> ZED-F9T L1/L2 and if all is well it will arrive tomorrow.
>> Now I need to understand how all this "postprocessing" works.
>> Some questions:
>>
>> 1: The ublox tools show ability to output basic or full raw data and 
>> there
>> are various scripts  to convert ublox data to Rinex and there are some
>> websites listing the commands required to get the required output but is
>> there a dummy's guide somewhere on how to get the RINEX data from the
>> ZED-F9T in the correct version/format for the postprocessing?
>>
>> 2: NRCan seems to process only for Canada (according to their website,
>> correct???). Auspos is listed as processing for the whole world. 
>> There are
>> some others. What would be a recommended service? I'm located in Europe.
>>
>> Erik.
>>
>>
>> Op wo 21 jun 2023 om 19:34 schreef Bob Camp via time-nuts <
>> time-nuts at lists.febo.com>:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The “big deal” with no L2 is fairly simple:
>>>
>>> One of the great things about dual freq modules is the ability to 
>>> send off
>>> data
>>> and very quickly get back a corrected version. If you use NRCan, this
>>> includes
>>> clock corrections. They are good to the ~ 0.1 ns level. You can get 
>>> to <
>>> 1x10^-14
>>> in less than a day.
>>>
>>> The problem is, the free correction services (at the moment) are L1 
>>> / L2
>>> based.
>>> For whatever reason, they don’t (yet) understand L5. That may 
>>> change, or it
>>> may not change. Right now, it’s the way it is ….
>>>
>>> If you want to go crazy, the Mosaic-T is the best of the best in 
>>> terms of
>>> GNSS
>>> modules at the moment. They apparently are well aware of this and 
>>> charge
>>> accordingly. You can buy a *lot* of F9T’s for the price of one 
>>> Mosaic-T.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave at lists.febo.com